On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz<pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the AUR/community move is done.
I would prefer a strategy which wont block "our" repos. For example I have php waiting in testing and Allan mentioned a libjpeg rebuild.
There are only a few packages in community which need a readline rebuild. So what about moving the readline rebuild very soon (tomorrow), commit the needed rebuild for community and then freeze it.
During the community transition we have an "empty" testing to play with libjpeg and others.
Yeah. Considering that the libjpeg updates may be much larger, let's plan on having community-testing ready for that rebuild. How does that sound?
Just noting that that libjpeg being large is wrong as far as community goes: 84 rebuilds in community for readline 31 rebuilds in community for libjpeg
Are you sure about that? From a quick glance at the bug reports, it seems to be the opposite: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15165 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222
But as Pierre pointed out, we can not hold up moving readline for this as php needs to get out of [testing]. I am happy waiting many days to start libjpeg...
Allan