27 Aug
2010
27 Aug
'10
1:57 a.m.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:18:30 +0200 Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Besides that, I think it's future proof. One issue though is that the meaning of: ('GPL2' 'GPL3') isn't the same as: 'GPL2 or later' It only is practically the same because there's nothing beyond GPL3 yet.
Just out of curiosity... Supposed, there is a GPL4 around at some time in the future. Now, if I receive some software under the terms of "GPL2 or later", would it be in my right, to redistribute said software under "GPL3 only" as opposed to "GPL3 or later"?