On 01/13/2013 04:00 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 01/13/2013 03:52 PM, Xyne wrote:
Kwpolska wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
It doesn't support them directly, but many packagers use Felix' workaround. If you are going to spam AUR like Jorge did, I'll be in really wild mood, trust me.
What did he do that you consider spamming?
88 packages are quite a lot. (src: OP’s original split PKGBUILD)
When did contributing to the AUR become "spamming"? The packages are for separate languages and directly correspond to upstream. I do not consider that spam at all. If anything, it is a commendable effort to provide those packages despite the AURs inability to (fully) support split packages.
If TUs now threaten users who contribute too much then I think something has gone very wrong.
I wonder if he also consider the libreoffice packages in the repos to be spam.
I wonder if you have something constructive to say. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/