On Tuesday 24 December 2013 14:02:43 Armin K. wrote:
I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments) but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-svn so someone else can step up maintaining, but since I've asked maintainer of llvm-svn (which you can also see in comments of llvm-svn package) to merge clang-svn into it, you can go ahead and merge it instead of disowning it first, then merging it later.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clang-svn into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-svn
Hi. First, our rules assume communication with the maintainer via e-mail [1, the third paragraph], because some people disable notifications about new comments. And this package isn't marked as out-of-date. Second, I don't think merging clang into llvm is a good idea. I believe that packages in AUR must not contain several different packages (as clang and llvm), because it creates difficulties when creating a dependency tree and finding a needed package. tl;dr I will not merge clang into llvm, but if other TU thinks otherwise he may do it. And for disown the package you must contact with its maintainer via e- mail. Happy New Year =) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarcanis@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arcanis@jabber.ru