Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos

On 3/16/24 14:56, Aaron Liu wrote:

To reduce this confusion, maybe the latter version's package should be named like "wechat-uos-qt" instead.

Make good sense. I for one would prefer a Qt backend over whatever electron is and it would make identifying the toolkit used easier. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.