27 Mar
2011
27 Mar
'11
11:09 a.m.
I'm sitting here hoping that the current bin32- naming convention does not become deprecated, other than for some even better way of handling the situation where both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries are available and a package that installs the 32-bit binary on an x86_64 system is also useful. On 26/03/11 16:12, Pierre-Antoine Vanpe wrote:
I would also want to know about this for my utorrent package, They only provide a bin 32 binary but I decided to make only one package for both archs, should I create a bin32-utorrent-server package? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253