On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ionuț Bîru <biru.ionut@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
i've compiled a list of votes from the last 6 proposals just to see if it happened by accident to not vote.
http://dev.archlinux.org/~ibiru/votes.txt
from this only 3 users didn't vote for more than 3 times.
Ranguvar, swiergot and vegai. From our wiki none are marked as inactive.
Ranguvar i know he's active in this list, not so much in voting, swiergot i don't remember him at all, vegai i guess is busy.
What happened guys?
-- Ionuț
Quoting the TU Bylaws Quote section: "This section deals with quorums, and the consequences for those that repeatedly keep the group from meeting them. Quorums were established to make sure that all TUs are having a say in the matters that they vote on, and to ensure that TUs remain active in the job that they have taken on. All active TUs should be participating in discussions and voting procedures in order to continue meeting the quorums. **For this reason, active TUs that keep quorum from being established on a voting procedure for three consecutive voting procedures (they need not be on the same motion) are automatically brought up for removal procedure, by reason of unwarranted inactivity. **" I don't wanna point anybody, I am in fact as a simply user and not tu, grateful with all people who contributes to Arch, but it's time to know who still in the boat... So IMO we should start a removal procedure for swiergot (Sorry Jaroslav is nothing personal, I don't know you), and going through with Ranguvar (who since he is relatively new, I will gave him a right of replication) .. and vegai don't know if still interested in TU Duties, we can ask him personally what happened.., he seems to be Active. So let's start the removal procedure for swiergot (who is pretty dissapeared). -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com