On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:57:34 +0800 Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 8 December 2010 05:44, keenerd <keenerd@gmail.com> wrote:
After much heavy thought, I withdraw my application. My apologies for the trouble.
You shouldn't let other issues hinder your application. Reconsider withdrawing, because it would disappoint your sponsor. You were asked a very simple question:
"Considering this and the still-ongoing discussion about the AUR guidelines, do you agree that it would be prudent to be more patient in the future and wait until we've come to a conclusion before going ahead with something like this again?"
And that's about it. Maybe some took the bot issue a little too seriously, but we would still vote. Personally, I believe you will be of help to the team :)
Don't withdraw, you made a good impression and as long as you answer this question of Xyne I don't think there are people that vote against you as long as you assure to keep waiting till something is decided in the future. An Abstain is not a No, it is to reach quorum and I'm still mostly tending to that, as Lukas said you made a very good impression and I think if we two had real contact in the past, I still would vote clearly for you. I think this application will pass, I guess there are enough of us who really know you and vote for a Yes as they really know your person and don't just read some forum posts as I did. So don't withdraw, just make a clear assurance to keep low till something is really discussed and you'll pass, as long as there are more Yes votes than No votes and like I said there won't be many of the latter as you really left a good impression. An Abstain is to reach Quorum it currently has no influence on wether a vote passes or not. -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4