Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 09:21:57 +0100:
Hello archers,
for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users before submitting.
Thanks for your opinion, Philipp
[1] http://luagraph.luaforge.net/ http://luaforge.net/projects/luagraph/
# Maintainer: Philipp Gesang <megas dot kapaneus at gmail dot com> pkgname=luagraph pkgver=1.0.4 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="LuaGRAPH is a binary module to create, manipulate, layout and render graphs using the Lua programming language." arch=("any") url="http://luaforge.net/projects/${pkgname}" license=("MIT") depends=("lua" "graphviz") source=("http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/4528/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz" "LICENSE") md5sums=("f2f71bcbabf243792e230665b1403f58" "814f32bd3d115e90f777e7baf714338d")
build() { cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}" || return 1 make install -Dm0755 graph/core.so "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/lua/5.1/graph/core.so" || return 1 install -Dm0644 graph.lua "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/lua/5.1/graph.lua" || return 1 install -Dm0644 LICENSE "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/LICENSE" || return 1 }
Is there a reason to distribute it as a binary? Compiling from source is the preferred way. Link to source tarballs: http://luaforge.net/frs/?group_id=237&release_id=1626 Also, binary packages should be postfixed with -bin. Regards, Philipp