9 Oct
2008
9 Oct
'08
3:03 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files, making the current use of Maintainer redundant.
I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have an opinion on that?
+1 -- Callan Barrett