On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Isaac Dupree < ml@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
On 01/05/11 13:55, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
If you have any questions about MooseFS feel free to ask me, it has been an amazing application for my company!
While we're asking, any thoughts about Tahoe-LAFS? - distributed, fault-tolerant AND with quite thought-out encryption. http://tahoe-lafs.org/ Googling suggests to me that it doesn't have its own FUSE but it is sometimes combined with sshfs (that's possible since Tahoe-LAFS provides an SFTP interface, among other interfaces).
-Isaac
Ah yes Tahoe, I didn't spend as much time with this one, but it looks promising! In my tests MooseFS was faster and the failure support was a bit better, I would have to really dig into my note to remember exactly what it was that turned me off on it.
I remember it being fairly nice though! I will have to play with it some more!
Oh, it is lower on my list, but I wanted to make SELinux more powerful in Arch too, I am one of the VERY few who not only know how to handle SELinux, and likes to use it :)