19 Jun
2014
19 Jun
'14
10:02 a.m.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet <ichimonji10@gmail.com> wrote:
Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages.
— Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nanoc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nanoc/
Merged, thx. -- Maxime