On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:37 PM, P. A. López-Valencia <vorbote@outlook.com> wrote:
I do the same as well. Don't try to make the argument that "as the arsehole has more packages, he deserves to be in charge".
Nice strawman you got there. For the record (if you actually misread me and aren't really trying to mislead), I never said that nor I believe that.
You would do it if you had already been harassed in private for the previous six months, maybe more.
Why didn't you bring up the issue when the harassment was happening? I'm not asking in an aggressive manner, it's just that I think you should have done that (instead of attacking him/her after a lot of time has passed, and throwing ad-hominem accusations instead of actual harassment proof).
I don't recall those details because, who would? That's the kind of thing you simply forget (If you are a Christian, you'll know the application of "turning the other cheek"). I certainly thought at the time I let Vuze go "Fuck it, he can have it and the turd polishig dummy can deal with the psycho." I can only guess David Blair went through a similar experience; may you not be in our shoes.
I'm sorry that you felt that way, but the best thing you can do is recall exactly those details you forgot. From what I read, I don't see that Det did anything wrong. -- William