On 2010-09-09 18:49 +0300 (36:4) Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas <antonioluccas@gmail.com> wrote:
hi,
wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers are active, and both packages get the latest version from svn of this package (even the packages containing a version on them). what do you guys do in this situations?
<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504
abracos Antonio Lucas
I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct name, but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes.
I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which package we should keep. :]
The correct name should always take precedence in my opinion, regardless of the number of votes or upload date. It provides a more consistent system. In this case I would recommend that the original uploader be allowed to adopt the correctly named package.