On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
Try to find out what compile options does the upstream -bin one use or ask on pandoc mailing list. BTW, http://pandoc.org/installing.html links to a nonexistent AUR package instead to the brand new pandoc package from the repos.
It sounds the old AUR package "haskell-pandoc" pointed by "http://pandoc.org/installing.html", which is no longer available, is the same new community "pandoc" package. How complete or incomplete is that pandoc package I wouldn't know. Installing from source uses "cabal", whereas the PKGBUILD for pandoc uses "runhaskell" directly with several options.
I'm not a haskell guy, so I can't tell, but it seems that pandoc plus other community pandoc packages, might be equivalent to the pandoc-bin in AUR...
I'll just try it out.
Thanks all,
-- Javier
Oh well, dependencies, :-) pandoc-bin doesn't require a bunch of haskell packages, while pandoc (pandoc-haskell) does. So I'll stick with pandoc-bin, :-) Thanks to all again, -- Javier