On 9 July 2014 18:39, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
I'm going by the comments. If there's (still) a problem, you haven't brought it up in the past 4 days since the maintainer updated the package. Orphaning the package in this case isn't reasonable.
I have, just through e-mail directly to the maintainer. I didn't request it was to be orphaned; someone flagged it as "out of date" because there was no other option to click such as "needs fixing" (which is how this discussion started...)
You clearly do care, otherwise you wouldn't have: a) tried to hijack the package b) brought it up here
My AUR packages don't support/aren't tested with clang... but if someone commented on one requesting and explaining a simple change so that more people are able to use it, then I would implement it.