On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:42 AM, kachelaqa <kachelaqa@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/09/13 00:47, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
On 2013-09-01 09:49 +0100 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
python-pyside would be the correct name for it. J. Leclanche
Yep. The same applies to "shiboken".
Shiboken is alright because it's not an actual python library, it's a binary that generates python bindings.
eg: https://shiboken.readthedocs.org/en/latest/commandlineoptions.html J. Leclanche
The shiboken package includes a python module (installed under site-packages) in addition to the commandline tool:
https://shiboken.readthedocs.org/en/latest/shibokenmodule.html
On 02/09/13 02:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Ah. I suppose ideally they should be split...
Sounds reasonable. The equivalent sip tool for pyqt also has a python module which has been split out into separate packages (i.e. sip, python-sip and python2-sip).