On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:56, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 14/01/11 19:45, Peter Simons wrote:
Is there some sort of consensus among AUR maintainers how to deal with that kind of situation? If an AUR package is current, so to speak, but it doesn't compile, then what should be done with it?
I'd say that is what the comment section is for.
I was initially set on not getting involved in this discussion, but I think it's worth pointing out that the ArchHaskell team does have an issue tracker (on github) for the "Haskell ABS" tree. So putting a link to an issue in a comment is always an option. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus