On Thu 26 Aug 2010 12:48 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:03 +0200, Philipp wrote:
Hi, I just looked up the GPL notation again. Here's the relevant excerpt from the wiki:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
.. The (L)GPL has many versions and permutations of those versions. For (L)GPL software, the convention is:
* (L)GPL - (L)GPLv2 or any later version * (L)GPL2 - (L)GPL2 only * (L)GPL3 - (L)GPL3 or any later version
Now besides that this is obviously confusing there's another problem. How would you specify that a program is GPL3 only?
Here's my proposed scheme: GPL = Any GPL license GPL1 = GPL1 only GPL2 = GPL2 only GPL3 = GPL3 only
If you want to use 2 and 3, just list them both in the licenses array. Future proof.
I've never seen an applications under the 'any GPL" license, it's always GPL2 or higher....
It exists as part of the license at any rate.
either way, it is never future proof. What for some reason people start to switch licenses to GPL3 or higher if/when GPL4 is removed...there can always be something.
I'm very confused. Can you rephrase that?