3 Feb
2014
3 Feb
'14
10:43 p.m.
On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote:
Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the tarball is named upstream) to powerdns. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231 That's valid. I don't honestly mind. Though the lwks package in the ALUR really needs to be updated to fetch the source from upstream (which it currently doesn't do).
-- All the best, Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)