On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Daenyth Blankdaenythfirstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 13:02, Hugo Doriahugodoria@gmail.com wrote:
I am with Allan here. +1 for 'custom'.
I'd not agree here. Isn't public domain exactly the absence of a license? When something is public domain you have no obligations at all. Even citing the author's name isn't required. You can do what you want with a public domain work.
So I can't see why should we require to ship a different public domain declaration for each public domain package. I think something like 'none' or 'PD' without the obligation to install anything to /usr/share/licenses would be the best way to go here.