On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 07:03:10PM -0700, w9ya wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:44:30PM -0700, w9ya wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
My apologies. The list [1] is a survey of packages with under four votes done a couple of weeks ago.
This is the data represented, in order: number of votes size in KB package name
Remove: [0] 2888.58 jump-project
At the end are some totals.
ANALYSIS of your data as presented: The data you have generated merely shows some low single digit reduced server space reductions gained from removal of these pacakges. It does NOT show any other impact in and of itself. I again ask for a declared meaning to the numbers.
Please look at the totals Bob. These are not low single digit reductions.
Yes, as a percentage they would be. And when looking at statistics, that would be the most important numbers; i.e. How big a percentage difference will this make.
I'm not going to look up exact numbers right now, but [community] takes up about 11G. This would reduce space usage by about 1G, so that would make about 9% reduction in disk space. The proposal that will currently be tabled will not effect packages currently in [community] though. Cheers.