7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
11:54 p.m.
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't accusing you or your package of anything. Not sure what happened except those problems that came out of no where.
Don't worry, I didn't take it that way at all. I just wanted to clarify for anyone else following the thread so they don't walk away thinking that arch32-light might be dangerous. ;)
But arch32-light ate my babies =)
Hey, that's by design. Why do you think it's called "-light"? If you want to enjoy the act of procreation *and* the progeny it engenders, then you should use the non-light package. :P