18 Jul
2009
18 Jul
'09
10:43 p.m.
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:32:12 -0700 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the official repos, so they should do things correctly.
Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST have the arch in the package name
How are packages for "any" architecture currently handled? Are they duplicated for each architecture-specific repo?