Re: [aur-general] copy delete request

On 8 April 2013 17:12, Jonathan Arnold <jdarnold@buddydog.org> wrote:

Perhaps due to the copy vs copy-agent request, copy[1] was orphaned. I think it can be safely deleted, as copy-agent[2] is a better PKGBUILD, albeit not without its own flaws.

[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/

Removed, thanks.