On 17/08/2019 14:15, pavel.finkelshtein@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:30 +0200, Ike Devolder via aur-general wrote:
On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote:
@Ike,
I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps it might make sense to change the pkgname?
kodi-bin was chosen to have kodi-x11 as the default, if all "bin" packages provide kodi-bin and kodi depends on "kodi-bin", by default there would be kodi-gdbm installed, which most people can't actually What do you think about kodi-default-x11? Same hack, but looks prettier ☺
I think I'll keep it like it is right now. The reason it is like this is sufficient to keep it like this. When a new major version of kodi is on its way I'll reconsider if some changes are needed.
use. So by having kodi-bin as an actual package which holds kodi-x11 that is still most used, users of kodi-wayland or kodi-gdbm can install those alongside or alone to suit there needs.