Am Thu, 3 Feb 2011 04:14:16 +0100 schrieb Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca>:
I also believe that most users immediately think of [unsupported] and only [unsupported] when speaking of the AUR.
No, I guess most new Arch Linux users like me in the beginning of using Arch Linux are quite confused about the parallel usage of the terms [unsupported] and AUR. Every binary repo is called something in square brackets like [core], [extra], [community] etc., which are activated or deactivated in /etc/pacman.conf, but there is no repo [unsupported]. And at least I haven't found any reference on the AUR homepage to the term [unsupported]. From the user's point of view there is only AUR. So I guess at least for new users it should be made clear somewhere in the wiki and/or on the AUR homepage that AUR and [unsupported] are the same. Or the term [unsupported] or at least the square brackets around unsupported should be dropped completely. Heiko