They put their e-mail in a PKGBUILD file for another of their AUR PKGBUILD files. https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=libzim8 If the maintainer is not active and does not respond within a week or two then you could mark the package as out of date and then do an orphan request to take over the package. I did that for the "blabel" package a few years ago since the previous maintainer didn't update it. https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/m... https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/m... Venlig hilsen / Best regards Morten Jakobsen On Tuesday, February 11th, 2025 at 20:03, Michal Feix <michal@feix.family> wrote:
Hi!
I recently fixed a bug in icu73-bin AUR package and started to investigate how to push this properly to the maintainer. Wiki clearly says that one should avoid pasting patches into the comments section and rather email the patch to the maintainer. However, the profile detail of the maintainer with this package shows his e-mail address as "hidden". The PKGBUILD itself also does not have any maintainer entry that could be used to identify contact details of the maintainer so I broke the wiki rule and pasted the patch into the comments section. As the maintainer did not responded yet, my question in the meantime is - how is one supposed to discover maintainer's contact email in such case?
Thanks,
-- Michal