Hello everybody,
I'm the maintainer of the jdk6 package and about 10 days ago a person filed an out-to-date request for my package, as he had problems in building.
Yesterday evening I tried building it (with a normal 'makepkg' and with a 'CARCH=i686 makepkg' in order to be sure) and I had no problems (I suppose the user had errors in the download).
If someone could test by building the package, else I ask to delete the outdated request.
Giovanni Santini
---
Coding stuff: https://github.com/ItachiSan
Il 23/apr/2015 10:07 AM, Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) ==
* puppet-4.0.0-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * salt-2014.7.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-28 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-30 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-67 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.26-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-30 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-67 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.26-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) ==
* python-paste-2.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. foutrelis - 9 signoffs 2. jsteel - 1 signoffs