Hello everybody, I'm the maintainer of the jdk6 package and about 10 days ago a person filed an out-to-date request for my package, as he had problems in building. Yesterday evening I tried building it (with a normal 'makepkg' and with a 'CARCH=i686 makepkg' in order to be sure) and I had no problems (I suppose the user had errors in the download). If someone could test by building the package, else I ask to delete the outdated request.
Giovanni Santini --- Coding stuff: https://github.com/ItachiSan
Il 23/apr/2015 10:07 AM, Arch Website Notification nobody@archlinux.org ha scritto:
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
- 0 new packages in last 24 hours
- 0 known bad packages
- 0 packages not accepting signoffs
- 0 fully signed off packages
- 17 packages missing signoffs
- 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) ==
- puppet-4.0.0-2 (any)
1/2 signoffs
- salt-2014.7.5-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
- acpi_call-1.1.0-28 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- bbswitch-0.8-30 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- r8168-8.039.00-15 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- tp_smapi-0.41-67 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- vhba-module-20140928-11 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- virtualbox-modules-4.3.26-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
- acpi_call-1.1.0-28 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- bbswitch-0.8-30 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- r8168-8.039.00-15 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- tp_smapi-0.41-67 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- vhba-module-20140928-11 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
- virtualbox-modules-4.3.26-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) ==
- python-paste-2.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
- foutrelis - 9 signoffs
- jsteel - 1 signoffs