Hi, (I'm not sure if this post belongs here or perhaps to aur-dev, sorry for confusion.) Is there any convention regarding structure and naming of packages? I have a project implemented in C, which consist of a library and collection of utilities. In Debian world, this project is split across three packages: abc0 - library abc-bin - utilities abc-devel - headers and files for developers I'd like to create a package for Arch. How should I structure? Also, I'd like to have two variants of packages: one for latest stable release and one for development upstream hosted in SVN. Shall I use -svn suffix for the latter? I have checked the Wiki of ABS, Package Development category, etc. and I haven't found answer to my questions. Any pointers? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net