Re: [aur-general] Subdirectories: is my workaround acceptable?

On 16/06/2022 17:42, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote:

Hi fellow AUR maintainers,

Hello Claudia,

[..] I started working around that limitation by including a tarball [2] with my PKGBUILDs instead of a .vscode directory. While aurweb would have rejected that directory, it does accept the tarball.

The AUR is for hosting the PKGBUILD files and any patches / sources required to build those. Supplementary files such as IDE settings etc should not be there because they are not required for building said packages. Cheers, Leonidas -- Leonidas Spyropoulos PGP: 59E43E106B247368