On 9 July 2014 21:28, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <b@bpiotrowski.pl> wrote:
If only you were curious enough to actually use musl at least once it would be clear to you that the branch naming scheme used by upstream is at least misleading. Whatever you do 1.1.x is newer than 1.0 and in many cases is more useful.
But sure, better whine about clang and make unrelated comparison to developemnt of drivers in Linux kernel. Good luck, you are going to need it a lot.
-- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
"treat others as you would be treated; respect them and their views, even if you disagree with them." - Arch Wiki Are you really that ignorant/stupid/insulting? Here let me help you: (from http://www.musl-libc.org/download.html) ----------------------- Current Versions Mainline - 1.1.3 Stable - 1.0.3 ----------------------- Oh! did I forget to mention that it helps if you use bother to use the search facility once in a while. Click this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/musl-latest/ ...and check the submitter/maintainer/packager Steven. (aka stevenhoneyman if you STILL haven't realised!)