On 2016-04-08 03:26, 张海 wrote:
I'd like to package another version of the AUR package android-sdk ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-sdk/), but without any content in `/opt/android-sdk`, solely for managing package dependency and misc files such as icon, desktop file and profile script. The real content of the package should be managed by user itself under `/opt/android-sdk`, outside of pacman. (This is a preference for some users like me.)
Since it does not come with most of the package content, should I call it `android-sdk-fake`? But since it does come with the depenencies and misc files, it is not a "really fake" package. Should I go with `android-sdk-almost-fake` or something like that?
You should ask android-sdk maintainer to put these files into main package instead. Bartłomiej