It is interesting, it doesn't matter which is the ambit ( Ej: politics, public institutions, ... ), but always at the end those who have the power feel the need to restrict or control the flux of information. And by experience this need increases more and more in time. No hard feelings about what you say but this might end up badly. A friend, Hector PD: Transparency in not the same as anarchy. Might be that people don't like what is decided by those who take decisions but if it is done openly at least the people don't feel deceived. On 12 August 2011 19:31, Thorsten Töpper <atsutane@freethoughts.de> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:19:53 +0300 Ionut Biru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 08/12/2011 07:16 PM, keenerd wrote:
However, setting up a system like Gentoo's is a bit of a pain. The simplest way to go about this is for me to start sharing my #arch-tu log files. Preferably in real time.
I imaging this sort of thing would need a vote first, however. Thoughts?
I reject the idea.
I agree with Ionut: Not in any way. Also if there'd be another mailing list I'd strongly prefer a new mailing list in the way arch-dev works.
-- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
-- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: hseara@gmail.com Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253