On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?
I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD.
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100 Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0).
If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
Regards
Renato Garcia
Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. Be patient, it will be updated soon :)
Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp