I think you should announce that on a news. A news will be translated for each communities whereas a post in the forum will probably get ignored and non english speaking people won&#39;t be advised a cleanup is pending.<br>
<br>Maybe a link should be added to the front page of AUR ?<br><br>Cilyan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2008/5/2, Allan McRae &lt;<a href="mailto:mcrae_allan@hotmail.com">mcrae_allan@hotmail.com</a>&gt;:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<span class="q">Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old.<br>
<br>
<br>
 &nbsp;<br>
</blockquote></span>
Then they probably fall in this category of the suggest removal guidelines<span class="q"><br>
&nbsp;- outdated and orphaned packages with few or no votes<br>
<br>
<br></span>
This situation is behind my reasoning to create a list of potential removals first. &nbsp;I think we need to be careful of removing too many packages, especially in our first cleanup attempt. &nbsp;Just the really unneeded ones as a first step. &nbsp;I had even considered that once the list was made, then I would archive all the relevant PKGBUILDs before deleting them. But it would be better to just not delete useful packages in the first place...<br>

<br>
Cheers,<br><span class="sg">
Allan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></blockquote></div><br>