Heh, I knew you would say that. I can't get used to vimperator (tried it several times) and I like mutt's interface better than gmail's (for instance, mutt's threads view is way clearer, imo). I also found that I could read all new emails much faster in mutt than in gmail -- I just TAB my way around in each label/directory instead of clicking and scrolling. My muscle/finger memory makes me more efficient at using mutt than the web interface, that's all. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:40, Andrei Thorp <garoth@gmail.com> wrote:
For the sake of argument, isn't there an offline mode for gmail, as well as vimperator for even more keyboard binding goodness?
-AT
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Ricardo Martins <ricardo@scarybox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:13, Andrei Thorp wrote:
sup and offlineimap seem promising. I'll want to look into them more in the future.
For the sake of discussion, what is it that you folks prefer about your offline setups vs gmail-in-browser?
Cheers,
-AT
I love mutt and had Gmail's web interface discard my emails accidentally when I was composing them. I also like being able to access my email even when I'm offline.
It's mostly habit, though. I prefer avoiding the mouse and using the keyboard (I know about gmail's keyboard shortcuts), so mutt makes sense in my case.
Regards, -- Ricardo Martins * ricardomartins.cc * GPG key: 0x1308F1B4
Regards, -- Ricardo Martins * scarybox.net * GPG key: 0x1308F1B4