On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:56:12 +0100 Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
Thorsten Töpper wrote:
Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation to vote.
Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a future one but not for this.
Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not Trolling User. This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it.
Regardless of how it was meant, "Trolling User" was inappropriate imo. The intentions were good. It's the rashness that's the problem as far as I'm concerned. Realizing that it was a bad idea and that there are better ways to do things is enough.
You're right, that was far too harsh, pardon me for this formulation. @Kyle: Starting a discussion about the tarballs was a good idea, what followed was wrong, so I'm stuck between an Abstain and a No and I guess some other TUs are also thinking about how they should handle this. The discussion is nearly finished, still a statement from your side might help to decide, which of these two options seems right, even after the end of this phase. -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4