I agree with this decision by you, but I suggest we keep policy in the habs/README.md file. Would you mind updating it to reflect that we won't package newer versions of packages which are bundled with GHC? /M On 16/01/11 16:50, Peter Simons wrote:
The following packages are provided by extra/ghc, but they are also on AUR:
|--------------------------+--------| | Package Name | AUR ID | |--------------------------+--------| | haskell-array | 21716 | | haskell-bytestring | 17970 | | haskell-cabal | 25443 | | haskell-containers | 19697 | | haskell-directory | 25399 | | haskell-filepath | 21717 | | haskell-haskell98 | 19698 | | haskell-hpc | 17922 | | haskell-old-locale | 21718 | | haskell-old-time | 25400 | | haskell-pretty | 21720 | | haskell-process | 21465 | | haskell-random | 21721 | | haskell-syb | 21263 | | haskell-template-haskell | 19699 | | haskell-time | 17900 | | haskell-unix | 21722 | | haddock | 7651 | |--------------------------+--------|
That is probably not a good idea. Could someone please delete those packages from AUR?
Take care, Peter
-- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus