On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:42 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de>wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard:
utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD.
Thanks,
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602
Done, thank you.
A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate of utserver [2]. They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I think, a better naming.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602
I have checked the packages and utorrent-server is better packaged then the second since it has a better name and support for both arches. Can't we just notify packager [1] to use package [2] and remove [1] :P -- Jelle van der Waa