Le dim. 23 févr. 2020 à 15:36, Bert Peters via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> a écrit :
On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 13:17 +0100, Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote:
Hi folks,
I've built my first PKGBUILD based on Brunio Renié's vaudtax, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vaudtax/
https://gitlab.com/greut/getax
Do you think I could propose it as is to aur-request? Do you see anything that could be improved?
Cheers,
Some things that stand out: - You prepare shouldn't ever download things; you should use the sources array for that. - The build function isn't mandatory and can be left out if unused. - The included `getax` script checks for java somehow, which is a direct dependency. If this script comes from somewhere else, include it in the sources array. Otherwise, just assume that your dependencies are actualy isntalled. - You should consistently quote $srcdir and $pkgdir since they may contain spaces. - Not sure if there is a rule about it, but a package description in French seems odd to me. - You depend on a specific java package rather than a specific java version, or just java-environment. Why? - Take a look at the java packaging guidelines in [1], it has more general tips wrt to packaging java apps.
Wow, thanks a lot. I've managed to: - use source for all the files - simplify the shell script by assuming all the dependencies are installed - translate the description :) - and more. Although, it only works with Java 8... so it has to stick to jre8-openjdk. I did use some trickery to recreate the downloaded file hierarchy. I'm hoping very much that my state (Geneva, hence GeTax) will provide a tarball containing the updates which will make my life much easier. Automatic updates makes close to no sense in an environment with a working package management. But that's another story. Thanks to Doug and Eli as well, much appreciated! Shall I proceed with creating the AUR on aur.archlinux.org? -- Yoan Cheers,
Bert.
[1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Java_package_guidelines