The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. Sorry for my bad english =( On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Velásquez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position instead of calling it "Semi-TU".
This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it.
Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
Let's see what happens!
-- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com