Hello, as I already explained to Michael Schubert, ImageJ plugins must be installed into some specified plugin directory to be found. In order to allow users manually installing plugins locally, the original package creates a plugin directory structure in the $HOME. The rational of making imagej-shared was to have a clean package without an error prone launch script but forcing plugins to be installed into /usr/share/... preferably by making a archlinux package for each plugin. But there are really many plugins, so this method has its inconvenients as well, so it doesn't seem easy to decide which one is better. Before just "merging" the two packages - you actually just deleted mine - did you make sure the imagej-plugin-* packages continue working? -- Paolo Herms On Tuesday 04 September 2012 22:27:44 Michael Schubert wrote:
Dear TUs,
Please merge imagej-shared [1] into imagej [2]. Both use the non-java-bundled version of the software as they should.
Maintainer of [1] in CC.
Thanks Michael
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40634 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26559