20 Sep
2014
20 Sep
'14
1:46 a.m.
On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that contain the package need to be named.
There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named packages that not follow the name.
but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version> will be used. Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for versions if ou are going to follow uptream.
I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of this. Also, please don't top-post, as already stated. Det