2 May
2008
2 May
'08
3:27 p.m.
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old.
Then they probably fall in this category of the suggest removal guidelines - outdated and orphaned packages with few or no votes This situation is behind my reasoning to create a list of potential removals first. I think we need to be careful of removing too many packages, especially in our first cleanup attempt. Just the really unneeded ones as a first step. I had even considered that once the list was made, then I would archive all the relevant PKGBUILDs before deleting them. But it would be better to just not delete useful packages in the first place... Cheers, Allan