[aur-general] Package naming where sources are not official

Hi all, I adopted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ a while ago to nurture it back into health after seeing that it was trying to use outdated files in /proc/ amongst other fatal bugs. The owners haven't updated their sourceforge in a while (five years), so decided to have a hack at rewriting it myself to work with modern installations. That's enough background, it's mostly working now, but the PKGBUILD is pointing to my source code. Question: Should I have the aur package renamed to account for the fact it's not using the 'true', 'official' sources even though those haven't worked for years? Cheers for your opinions. -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B