On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 16:28, Anders Bergh <anders1@gmail.com> wrote:
The votes are: yes - 16, no - 2, abstain - 3, which means he reached a quorum!
A remark, absolutely not related to this new TU in particular, and in no way related to my voting period (as far as I remember, I didn't get any "no"): I see votes against a candidate here. I perfectly understand that someone can think a candidate is not good enough (even if I would disagree in that particular case), that there are too many trusted users (which would seem dumb to me), etc. Actually, any reason at all. But I think that a "default" behaviour, if a candidate is "globally" OK, would be to vote "yes". That doesn't need explainations. Else, why you think "no" is a better vote should be explained, because it might means that you have something interesting to say! That's not an attack over the 2 "no" voters in particular (I don't have SQL access ;), but a general thought: if there's any reason for you to vote "no" and if that reason wasn't exposed before, maybe you should consider send it to the ML... Communication isn't overrated when it's about some new hands! Congratulations to Daenyth! -- Geoffroy Carrier