2014-09-23 17:39 GMT-03:00 Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com>:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 05:22:52PM -0300, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel <marcel.lists@gmail.com>:
Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from
fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do "java-<major version>-<project name>". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle JDK", and that's why I chose it. Now, OpenJDK apparently still calls these
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com> wrote: the projects by
their "base name"[3], but _I_ would still prefer (read: I don't "refuse"; I prefer) having packages called "jdk8-openjdk" and "jdk" that install in "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk/" and "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-jdk/", respectively.
This also means we can currently do:
$ man java-openjdk8 $ man java-jdk8
To access the man pages.
For what it's worth, I support this naming scheme.
Kind regards, Marcel
I preffer ad a hyphen after the version as all the other arch packages do when is needed. so my vote is for : * java-openjdk-8 * java-jdk-8
-- *Pablo Lezaeta*
All the other arch packages? Really?
$ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec '[^-][0-9]+$' 322
$ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec -- '-[0-9]+$' 5
Ironically this show how bad I'm greep-ing, Well if is for follow the main rule go for the *java-openjdk8 and *java-jdk8 I will be happywhit this one specifically -- *Pablo Lezaeta*