1 Sep
2011
1 Sep
'11
8:15 p.m.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200 Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page) for what could be achieved by simply defaulting to https?
I don't really understand why it's so important to break existing links by forcing everyone onto the https page. What happens if you *don't want to use https*? Why are the Arch webby bods forcing this nanny-state twatmuppetry down our throats? -- Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ <gordonjcp@gjcp.net>