I'm probably the worst person to give advice on this given my semi-inactivity lately (although I did announce it and I'm still trying to keep my packages up to date), but if he isn't maintaining anything actively in official repos, and does not respond to contact attempts, then I would agree that he is not conforming to the bylaws. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi,
Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year.
Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion.
Here are my reasons:
1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't got any replies from him.
2) no commits in community since the addition.
3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this proposal doesn't have sense. Quoting:
"There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted and undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure deviates from the above."
I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.
-- Ionuț